
Global connections ... now-a-days individuals all around the world are connected with one another through the internet and growing immigration. The virtual community is connecting people who may have the same interests, beliefs, or back grounds. Community is no longer local but global. Online communication also has a tendency to attract criminals and their criminal acts. On the other hand when you have a vast community like this, help goes out to where it is most needed. For example, the 2004 tsunami devastated many in and around the area of Asia. It is thrilling to think that the global community immediately reach out; lending both resources and money. Being a part of such a huge community, more often than not you won’t be left to figure things out on your own.
Transnational corporations and companies have much to offer: jobs, shops that meet needs, and growth for towns and cities including their economies. They are very influentially powerful and fortunately they are taking that and using it to promote great standards of sustainability for development, human rights and community involvement. These willingly adopted standards were set in place by the International Organization for Standards. This network of standards works to develop technical standards for industries and services which are designed to make manufacturing and supply of goods and services safe and environmentally sustainable. Sadly, all corporations don’t seem as honourable and have been known for low wages, increasing poverty in addition to low environmental standards that attract corporations, causing for deterioration of the planet. Wal-Mart is a prime example for standards that just seem under par receiving criticism. The disadvantages that are said to outweigh the advantages are low wages, few benefits, taking business away for the small downtown stores and since more times then not, Wal-Marts aren’t situated in an area that is an easy walking commute, instead, driving is necessary resulting in greenhouse gases emitted. Some support is given involving the fact that they allow non-profit groups to fundraise on their property, and that they have created a community grant program that donated more the $61 million to community organizations in 2006.
Oil is an immense resource to build up a countries economy. Regrettably the term blood oil has been coined and refers to oil that is obtained through violence and bloodshed. This is happening in a few African countries such as the Sudan. A civil-war is going on between the government and those who aren’t cooperating and going against the oil industry. When it comes to oil in Iraq there is much to find; it is extremely abundant in oil resources. Ironically the imperial powers weren’t interested in this area of the world until word got out about its oil. Soon after it was taken over by Europe but now is independent. In 2003, Iraq was invaded by an American-led troop of invaders. It is believed that this was done to establish control over Iraq’s massive oil income. I’m pretty sure that today Iraq’s oil is in the hands of Western companies, primarily the U.S.. The States also got involved with Canadian oil when Canada was unwilling to play a lead role in developing it. By 1969, Canada was fearful they were losing control of their energy future. The Trudeau government developed a controversial National Energy Program, to ensure a Canadian presence in global development of energy resources. But with the North American Free Trade Agreement, it reduces restrictions on foreign ownership in the energy sector; this spurred development of Alberta energy projects including the tar sands.
Illnesses such as the Black Death gave a firsthand visual of how globalization really can affect all. Black Death started in Asia during the 14th century and spread into Europe. It was deemed that rats carried the illness along the Silk Road. Europe was already in a vulnerable state because of how war had disrupted farms and trade; famine became widespread. The Spanish flu also became a pandemic after World War 1 (1918-1920). Oddly enough this disease killed young adults instead of those who would have been thought the most susceptible like the young, old and sickly. The most recent would have had to been SARS. It first started in China and by the time the World Health Organization found out about it and informed the rest of the world, it had spread rapidly. Ten day quarantine halted the spread and it then died out. AIDS is a disease that continues to be an issue especially in Africa, I’m sorry to say there is no cure, only medications that are helping the ailing live a little longer. Globalization aided in spreading these diseases as well as informing people and letting them know of what precautions to take in order to handle it.
When it comes to global issues customers are becoming more influential. They are beginning to demand the right to know where their goods are coming from and how they were obtained. Some customers ask for fair trade items, while others want brand names. Boycotting is one way that people choose to have their voices heard, by acting in a way that shows little support for a company that endorses something like labour abuse (for example). Civil society is also having an impact, and it is assumed that these groups will balance out a strong money drive from businesses. The Government is also one of the most powerful forces in policy and decision making and that is exactly what they are doing. Policies have been put in place to promote fairness and equality.
To conclude, all these forces of globalization that connect our world through a range of diverse communities bring with it pros and cons. I don’t feel that globalization will ever have only positive outcomes because the people that drive globalization aren’t perfect. Virtual communities have connected many yet negatively affected many. Transnational’s have lead to prosperity for countless but also poverty to a multitude. Oil has driven an economy but also created great unrest and conflict. Illness and disease was spread and ended by the forces of globalization. Yet voices are free to be heard when it is time for justice and unity. So for me this question of how as citizens we need to response to globalization is the same, we have a choice and a choice that is easily made between promoting the positive elements of globalization over the negative. To bring peace and equal opportunity for all; globalization and its constructive ways need to be aided and helped along the way.